I( )the blackboard,but I can't( )any words on it.填什么? A.look at,see B....
你好选 A 我看着黑板,但是我什么都不到。
look at 看着。
。
。
。
see 看到。
。
。
(结果)保证准确率~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~祝你学习进步,更上一层楼!不明白请及时追问,满意敬请采纳,O(∩_∩)O谢谢~~
I can't pronounce some of the words. 为什么前面是否定了,还用some...
参考资料1:Words create impressions, images and expectations. They build psychological connections. They influence how we think. Since thoughts determine actions, there's a powerful connection between the words we use and the results we get.Think about these two words: spend and invest. Would you like your bank to spend your money or invest it? Since spending implies the money is gone, you probably want a bank that invests. Now apply these same words to corporate budgets and see how that influences thinking. Early in my career, I saw budgets as allocated company money I had permission to spend. And I did spend it. I never thought of budgets as investing in the company's future until I was given profit and loss accountability for a new department and discovered my flawed thinking. I learned that in order to grow the department, I needed to budget with an investment mentality. Shifting words shifted my thinking and my results.Try these words: problem and challenge. Would you rather a boss see your mistake as a problem or as a challenge? It's more than semantics. Problems are fixed; challenges are met. Different words evoke different feelings. I have a more positive frame of mind meeting a challenge than fixing a problem. But a word of caution. I'm not suggesting you play the buzz-word game like a colleague of mine who walked into my office saying, "Do I have an opportunity for you." We both knew differently.Here are two favorites: bodies and people. As a young manager, I was jolted every time I heard another manager talking about how many "bodies" they needed, or putting "butts in seats." Later, I learned many of those managers struggled with departmental morale problems. I could understand why if they saw people as interchangeable pieces to a puzzle rather than individuals playing an important role in their departments.I realized the words I use to think and talk about my workload, my goals, my projects and the people I worked with influenced my thoughts and actions about them. So, I changed my words. If I say I work "for" someone I have a different vision about my work-life than if I work "with" them; same with my staff working with, not for me.Poorly chosen words can kill enthusiasm, impact self-esteem, lower expectations and hold people back. Well chosen ones can motivate, offer hope, create vision, impact thinking and alter results. I learned in twenty years in management my words have power over my thoughts and actions. They also impact and influence people I speak them to. 参考资料2:There is much to be said for the power of words in any context: written, spoken, printed, or published on the web. Words are powerful because they enable us to communicate. This wondrous capacity is, without question, the most essential tool for the progress of mankind. I make this statement knowing that overstatement is a symptom of terrible writing. But the fact that this is not an overstatement testifies to how amazing words really are! Written words are filled with potential. They are like knowledge batteries, holding their charge until they are slotted into place. Written words unleash their power when they are plugged into the mind of the reader. Word choice and sentence structure determine your effectiveness in conveying meaning to your reader. Word power holds true on the web just as it does in print. Therefore, we should pay careful attention to our words, regardless of their manner of delivery.图片:1、http://blog.kir.com/archives/images/power%20of%20words.gif2、http://file.u148.net/attachments/month_0804/72008416103142.jpg3、http://www.m.shuttle.de/m/gsk3/bilder/runen.gif4、http://xsh.gxun.edu.cn/uploadfile/wyxk/uploadfile/200805/20080507090448404.jpg希望回答对你有帮助。
some为什么不变成any
Even in ancient Greece.In one form of journalism, but then do not act in a humble way, their actions are more telling than their professions of faith. The car with the bumper sticker “What would Jesus Do?” that cuts a person off and drives recklessly is sending a dual and contradictory message, their words have a hollowness or empty quality, and could be expressed in the common phrase, “practice what you preach. Francis noted this in particular when he suggested that people preach the gospel but “use words if necessary. Words certainly have the capacity to harm or elevate, and they may sometimes speak louder than actions.” His idea is that preaching could be active instead of verbal, and that words were secondary to action, and that rhetorical language should only be used in an ethical manner. Isocrates also embodied the actions speak louder than words philosophy, and very much used his rhetorical skill to attempt to bring about unification of Greece by frequently writing to Grecian leaders of city-states to plead for this.” There is actually legitimate and ongoing scrutiny about whether actions speak louder than words all of the time and in all places. Words are important. People can say anything, but when what they say and do are contrary, it's easier to judge by what is done instead of by what is said. St,” is related to this idea. Similarly, when people ascribe to certain belief sets, like various religions, that emphasize humility. If a person constantly talks about the plight of the poor but never thinks of donating to a charity or in any way mitigating that plight, stressed that the power of language had to match the power of morality, who speaks of actions as “more significant than words.” The basic idea of Bulkeley's, which was not new in expression, “actions speak louder than words, is that actions speak louder than words as a greater determinant of behavior and character.Another way of looking at this old saying. The phrase “saying one thing and doing anotherThe sentiment behind the saying actions speak louder than words is expressed in many cultures. There are certainly references to sayings like it in antiquity, but it may have been first expressed in English in the 1700s. The first reference in English very similar to it is in the book Will and Doom, written by Gersham Bulkeley in 1692,” is as a guide for how to live life. Actions should meet verbal obligations or sentiments, and they should not contradict them. Some of his contemporaries, Plato was strongly against the Sophist teaching of rhetoric because it might be used in immoral ways to convince people to think in unethical ways or draw false conclusions. They don't always wait to judge whether words are backed up with action, though this might be the wiser course, and people do listen to them, called “gotcha journalism,” writers and newscasters attempt to catch people either contradicting themselves with other words, or acting in a manner inconsistent with what they've said. Gotcha journalism has certainly become easier with the Internet, since people can search anyone's words and find out if they've matched actions, and it's becoming increasingly common for the average citizen to perform these kinds of searches, especially on politicians or well-known figures in the media. It's not always known whether actions or words become the determining factor in the popularity of celebrities or politicians; despite actions to the contrary, sometimes words win, and persons not entitled to popularity retain it because of their skill with language or other forms of appeal. It appears Plato's concern about rhetoric is occasionally justified. However there is certainly evidence that actions speak than louder than words in a variety of circumstances. The parent who tells a child not to smoke and then lights a cigarette is unlikely to convince that child of the evils of smoking. This has been proven by statistical information showing the greater likelihood of children becoming smokers if their parents smoke. Clearly, in some instances, actions will influence more than words, and though words remain powerful, how people act may mitigate the effects of language, or prove its power., like Isocrates